TrailGenic Science

Most fitness culture equates progress with intensity. The assumption is simple: higher heart rates, anaerobic burn, and exhaustion must mean better results. Training metrics tell a different story.

An Aerobic Training Effect (TE) of 3.6 paired with 0.0 anaerobic load is not a sign of undertraining. It reflects a system that can sustain high total work while remaining metabolically efficient.

Aerobic Training Effect measures the cumulative physiological stimulus of sustained aerobic effort. It is driven by excess post-exercise oxygen consumption (EPOC), not peak intensity. A score in the mid-3 range indicates a productive training load that improves aerobic capacity and endurance without overwhelming recovery systems.

Zero anaerobic load means the effort never repeatedly crossed into heavy glycolytic demand. There were no sustained lactate spikes, no reliance on short-term energy systems, and minimal neuromuscular or nervous system strain. This allows work to continue for hours rather than minutes.

In gym environments, anaerobic load accumulates quickly. Flat terrain, time constraints, and artificial pacing push intensity upward before total work can scale. The result is higher strain with lower overall adaptation.

In contrast, long mountain ascents apply continuous mechanical, gravitational, and environmental stress. Elevation gain, cold exposure, and duration increase aerobic demand while heart rate remains controlled. The body is forced to adapt through efficiency rather than intensity.

This is why prolonged mountain efforts can produce a meaningful Aerobic Training Effect with no anaerobic contribution. The stimulus is real, repeatable, and recoverable.

For Further Reading

TrailGenic Physiology Hub
TrailGenic Longevity Method
TrailGenic Longevity Playbook
TrailGenic Trail Logs

‍

‍